But he doesn't have, like, proprietary rights over John, or vice versa.
That, right there! That's the problem. All the people who think he *does*. Same reason people right Keller as an omg, mean bitch, for stealing Rodney away from John, who clearly has some prior claim to him despite never actually attempting to make it. It's the whole meant to be thing, I think, hence the reason they *have* to bring Rodney into John/Cam.
Oooh, link please? I'm too curious!!
Here you go (Oooh, link please? I'm too curious!!) (mainly argosy). I'm still miffed with her, because she edited her last comment to take out an original 'sorry' about not having time to be analyse-y, which, fine, she's not sorry, but I just thought was really rude and impolite. And also because I felt like I was being told off for not liking this stuff.
It's possible I way over-reacted, but I'm British, we value politeness!
Re: Addendum
Date: 8 June 2009 09:32 pm (UTC)That, right there! That's the problem. All the people who think he *does*. Same reason people right Keller as an omg, mean bitch, for stealing Rodney away from John, who clearly has some prior claim to him despite never actually attempting to make it. It's the whole meant to be thing, I think, hence the reason they *have* to bring Rodney into John/Cam.
Oooh, link please? I'm too curious!!
Here you go (Oooh, link please? I'm too curious!!) (mainly argosy). I'm still miffed with her, because she edited her last comment to take out an original 'sorry' about not having time to be analyse-y, which, fine, she's not sorry, but I just thought was really rude and impolite. And also because I felt like I was being told off for not liking this stuff.
It's possible I way over-reacted, but I'm British, we value politeness!